Jonathan King's new evidence suggests an alibi during teenage sexual abuse case. As the man who discovered groups such as Genesis and 1. Jonathan King was one of the most powerful figures in the music industry. There was a moment when the impresario seemed destined for high honours, but his world came crashing down when he was found guilty of sexually abusing teenage boys. Yet there are disturbing aspects to King’s conviction that have never been revealed, let alone discussed in public. And when he wrote to me from Maidstone Prison, I resolved to investigate. How could it be that the prosecution was allowed to change its evidence mid- trial, giving King no time to respond? Why were the pop mogul’s alibis not revealed to the jury? And why is a damning confession from one of his accusers still ignored? Today King is notorious. Yet as I explain in my new book, this is one case of historic . His visitors identified themselves as Surrey Police officers who needed to speak to him on an important matter. Fearing it concerned his elderly mother, King ran down the stairs and opened the door. He was taken to Staines police station, where he was astonished to find himself being interviewed about a man who claimed King had sexually abused him. The man had tried to sell his story to the now disgraced PR guru Max Clifford, who referred him to the police. At 8pm, King was charged with historic sex abuse and bailed. When The Sun reported the news the next morning, King responded: . Judge David Paget ruled that King would face two separate trials and imposed a media blackout to avoid prejudicing the outcome. The indictment contained six charges from five complainants. The first, whom we shall call Witness A, said he had first met King when he was . Witness B said King had spoken to him on Bayswater Road and later invited him to his house, where he assaulted him. Witness C said that during a family holiday in London in the summer of 1. King in a shop in Bayswater and asked for his autograph. Subsequently he was invited to King’s house and assaulted. He said that on one occasion King attempted to assault him: . He said he was assaulted on several occasions at King’s house. The final witness, Witness E, tried to sell his story to the News of the World before being referred to police. A heroin user, he admitted owing money to drug- dealers and feared for his safety. He testified that he went to see King with his elder brother when he was . Yet I have uncovered new evidence that casts serious and disturbing doubts over King’s conviction. In fact, King was in the United States when one of the most serious crimes was alleged to have been committed. And the man who accused him of repeated buggery is a drug addict who has since confessed that he fabricated the story to make money. Quando a Marvel Comics decidiu montar um est Allegations of historic sex abuse are notoriously difficult to disprove. But I believe King’s conviction – among the first of the celebrity sex cases that have seemed to obsess police over the last decade – is more concerning when viewed with today’s perspective. Many celebrities have been released without charge after their accusers have been shown to be misguided, fantasists or – worse – motivated by the promise of a lucrative payday. It is easy to forget now just how big a figure Jonathan King was in the pop world. Teetotal and someone who shunned drugs, he was a sort of pop Pied Piper, who befriended everyone from The Beatles to the Bay City Rollers. Jennifer O'Dell, Actress: The Lost World. Jennifer O'Dell was born on November 27, 1974 in Ridgecrest, California, USA. She is an actress, known for The Lost World. Goneo bietet professionelle und leistungsstarke L Scroll down–> THE CLASSICAL ALIBI IN PHYSIQUE PHOTOGRAPHY. The bracketed numbers in the text refer to the images in the gallery. For seven decades, Georgia O’Keeffe (1887–1986) was a major figure in American art. Remarkably, she remained independent from shifting art trends and stayed true. He had a golden touch, too, that would make him a multi- millionaire. King had his first hit record, Everyone’s Gone To The Moon, while still a Cambridge undergraduate in 1. As soon as he graduated, he had his own Saturday night ITV show before being chosen as the right- hand man of Sir Edward Lewis, the head of Decca Records. King discovered and produced Genesis, the Bay City Rollers and 1. The Rocky Horror Show. In the 1. 97. 0s and 1. BBC TV and radio. At the time of his arrest, he was about to be made head of music giant EMI. But a poisonous atmosphere surrounded his arrest – it made lurid news, with anyone standing up for King risking public condemnation. One person prepared to put up a substantial surety was an A& R man King had known for two decades, Simon Cowell. A third was Anthony Baker, one of the original presenters of King’s TV show No Limits. King denied all the offences. He acknowledged knowing four of the men as youths, but said he had shown them . He explained he often spoke to teenagers because he had been encouraged as a youth and because he needed to research the latest trends. His defence team set about dismantling the case against him. A key issue was the dates of the alleged offences and the ages of the complainants. In the 1. 98. 0s, relationships between consenting homosexuals between the ages of 1. Witness C and his sister both said they recognised King from his BBC pop show No Limits when they met him in 1. When the defence pointed out the show was not on air until July 1. Boy C insisted his account could be corroborated by his mother’s recently rediscovered diary. Police immediately made a 3. Albuquerque, N.M., alternative weekly featuring news, film, music, art, food, entertainment, blogs, personals and event calendars. Nightwood is a 1936 novel by Djuna Barnes first published in London by Faber and Faber. Nightwood is one of the earliest prominent novels to portray explicit. Warsztaty Terapii Zaj. King’s house, but said it had happened in September 1. Witness E recalled being given photos of Samantha Fox when he visited King’s house aged 1. But Fox’s personal assistant told the court that the pictures could not have been taken before May 1. Witness E at least 1. An American Express restaurant receipt from a New York restaurant showing that Jonathan King was in New York on 9 Sept 1. UKThrough a mixture of proven alibis and doubts over details, the defence demonstrated serious flaws, doubtless to the concern of the prosecution. But what happened next was as dramatic as it was unfair. The prosecution persuaded the judge to alter the stipulated dates in four of the six counts – effectively sidestepping King’s defence. According to the new dates, the complainants were under 1. But all were older than originally claimed and the reliability of their original statements was surely cast into doubt. King wanted to make a vigorous protest, but had no one to make it for him. Neither his solicitor nor barrister was present in court – his barrister had left court to appear at the Victoria Climbi. King suddenly found himself facing revised charges to which he was not allowed to put a defence. The judge summed up. Ironically – in view of what would later come to light – he indicated that the defendant should not be condemned because of his inability to provide alibis. However, the judge did impress upon the jury that the mother’s diary had allowed them to fix some points of time. King was found guilty on all six charges and jailed for seven years. Six weeks later, the second case collapsed amid doubts about the key witness. King was found not guilty of all charges, but the media was free to publish lurid accounts of the first case, neglecting to report the acquittal or the extraordinary development of the indictment being changed after the defence case had closed. It was only when King was released in 2. The case of the diary is the most fascinating. The original charge was King attempted buggery on a day between October 1, 1. February 8, 1. 98. But the dates were changed to between September 6 and 9, 1. As a convicted sex offender, King was now not allowed to go to the US, so asked a friend to collect his belongings from his Manhattan apartment. The friend found documents proving that on August 2. King flew to New York at the BBC’s expense. Passports, bank receipts, American Express slips and other documents prove he and his . A witness statement, pictured, provides an alibi for King. On Sunday, September 1, he attended a Bruce Springsteen concert. On the Friday, he had lunch with his US accountant. On September 7, he took BBC employee Ursula Kenny to see the film Back To The Future. A day later, he went to the US Open men’s final, where he bumped into an old friend, Paul Marshall, a lawyer. On September 9, King did some shopping before flying home, arriving at Heathrow on the morning of September 1. He renewed his visa on the 1. New York on the 1. He attended the MTV awards on the 1. BBC filming on the 1. Passports, bank receipts, American Express slips and other documents prove he and his . They also checked the diary of the witness’s sister, which didn’t correspond either to her brother’s account or their mother’s diary. The case was not referred to the Court of Appeal, despite the fact the judge had told the jury details that were wrong. Had the jury known both dates for the attempted buggery were impossible, they would have been entitled to view the evidence with deep scepticism. The most serious charge against King was Witness C, who alleged buggery. I investigated the claim after someone contacted me with information. Stuart Williams said he had become addicted to painkillers and then drugs after an industrial accident, and had met the complainant at a counselling service for addicts. Williams described the man as a . He said King never buggered him. He said, “I said he’d done stuff he hadn’t done, but I thought everyone was doing that.” 'He said he felt guilty, but lied so he could get cash. He sold his story twice – for . I don’t know what he did with the . They may be emotionally vulnerable and suggestible, and there is also a financial inducement to consider. It was only when King was released in 2. In the statement of offence, pictured, the dates of the offences were changed Those alleging sexual abuse are guaranteed anonymity and can claim Criminal Injuries Compensation, even if a suspect is acquitted. There are, however, key tests of evidence, all of which were failed in this case. The first is to evaluate the circumstances in which the original complaint arose. The jury never knew the original claimant was motivated by selling his story because that case never reached court. The second is jurors must be given a chance to understand the totality of the complaints. The Crown alleged a pattern of behaviour could be discerned.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |